Page Updated 29 June 2001
(Current
CST Time from NIST & USNO)
US
Weather -- MS
Radar -- Hsv
Radar
The Weather Channel -- USSat
IR Image
USAToday, CNN,
USNews,
TimeMag,
ScienceNews,
ScientificAmerican,
Discover,
ScienceDaily
This has been one of the main messages of LIB from its beginning!
See Information About Hill Roberts and Tom Couchman's Teaching Efforts
in Russia in February 2001
Newly Announced Hominid Fossil
Kenyanthropus
“We’ve always assumed Lucy was our ancestor
and now we need to
re-evaluate that idea,”
said geologist Frank Brown, dean of the College
of
Mines and Earth Sciences at the University of
Utah.
Skull
Of New Early Human Relative
Found
In Kenya -- Did Humans Descend
From
Lucy Or From Newly Discovered
Creature?
SciDaily
3/23
Or maybe neither? (gasp)
Once again, producing more data
only muddies the case for human evolution.
And they were so sure about
Lucy!!!
(Well, Johanson was. The Leakey's never accepted
Lucy as ancestral, but then the Leakeys didn't discover Lucy.)
Photos
of the volcanic lava flows on Io, one of Jupitur's moons.
Stunning!!!
CNN.com/SPACE (2/27/01)
JPL Galileo
Photo Site
New
Evidence for Life on Mars?
Ivan Noble
ARN
Human
Genome Map Has Scientists Talking About the Divine --
Surprisingly
low number of genes raises big questions
Tom Abate
ARN
"I saw a TERRIFIC bit on Discovery about the
Weaver Ant.
Simply AMAZING. When I looked on the
web,
I saw this interesting page on the Miracle
of Ants.
What I found most interesting was the author's
perspective.
He attributes the intellect in these insects
to Allah.
Studies such as these, aside from immediate applications for personal
vanity,
are showing us that the long lifetimes recorded in the Bible are not
scientifically incredible.
It has long been held by many believing scientists that
accumulated chromosomal damage unnaturally shortens life.
These findings seem to be leading in that direction.

This evidence demonstrates for the first time
how rapidly adaptation can lead to
reproductive isolation, and it is about
10 times faster than the previously accepted
maximum. "This should really make us rethink
the importance of natural selection
and adaptation to the rapid generation of new
species and the generation of
biological diversity."
Hendry does offer a word of caution: "Despite
our findings of rapid adaptation and
reproductive isolation, I don't necessarily
presume these two salmon populations
will evolve into what would be recognized
as separate species. We have simply
used new populations to demonstrate the same
processes that lead to new
species." (emphasis added:HR)
ScienceDaily
10/20/2000
Professors Russell H. Vreeland and William D. Rosenzweig say they have
awakened a 250-million old bacteria found inside a salt crystal retrieved
from deep underground in New Mexico. The bacteria was identified as a strain
of _Bacillus_ and a relative of another salt-loving bacteria, _B. marisomortui_.
The findings, published in yesterday's _Nature_, easily surpass all previous
longevity records for organisms revived from apparent suspended animation.
The
discovery has captured the imaginations of the press and the scientific
community, and possibly lends support to those who argue that life fell
to earth after drifting across space for countless millennia. There are
also skeptics, of course, including those who argue that the bacteria the
scientists grew in the lab were simply contemporary microbes that somehow
got into their sample.
http://www.nature.com/nature/fow/001019.html
http://web.philly.com/content/inquirer/2000/10/19/front_page/ANCIENT19.htm
http://www.discovery.com/news/briefs/20001018/ea_oldbugs.html
http://www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/10/18/oldest.microbe/index.html
http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/front/2000/1019/fro3.htm
http://www.wcupa.edu/_academics/sch_cas.bio/
ScienceNews
(155:24) June 12 1999
Ribosomes
Revealed
Now we can see
a ribosome "reading" the gentic code to assemble enzymes and proteins.
Amazing Design Complexity!
Debunking
the Digital Brain
Brain processing turns out to be Even More Complex
than previously known.
Notice how often the article references the complexity
of neurons!
Score
One for Punk Eek (Punctuated Equilibrium)
While the article claims this proves PE,
what it seems to show is that
genetic limits prevent such processes
from exceeding only a microevolutionary capability.
Notice that after only two punctuations, no more
were obtained; yet
this experiment was done with some of the most
highly adaptable critters known, bacteria.
If such bacteria hit a hard limit in two events,
higher life forms are pretty well out of luck for doing any PE.
Such is the nature of some of the critiques within
the article itself.
Remember the fundamental truth of this experiment:
in an equivalent 60,000 yrs of evolution, these
E. coli turned into ...
somewhat larger E. coli.
That's very limited adaptation, not macroevolution.
Recent
Neanderthals
This article shows that the relation between
Neanderthal and Sapiens is just not well understood.
The article gives some good background on the
bum rap N. has traditionally gotten.
But not all stem cell research is on embryos.
Adult bone marrow stem cells proving quite useful.
ScienceDaily,
Nov 1, 2000
Neptune Rising
Neptune's early influence on the Kuiper belt
and Pluto
Discover,
September 2000
Curtis Rist
This thoroughly secular article shows why life should not be hastily expected to be prolific in the universe.
Paleontologists at Oregon State University say the animal, Longisquama
insignis, was a small reptile with feathers. It glided among
trees in central Asia 220 million years ago, around the time of the
earliest dinosaurs and 75 million years before the first bird.
This discovery, to be outlined Friday in the journal Science, may answer
some major questions about the earliest development of
birds, compel changes in widely accepted theories of evolution and
ruffle some feathers in museum exhibits around the world.
"These are some amazing fossils, and at the very least they prove that
feathers did not evolve in dinosaurs," said John Ruben, an
OSU professor of zoology. "The supposed link between dinosaurs and
birds is pretty entrenched in paleontology, but it's not as
solid as the public has been led to believe."
(Thanks to Greg Kreis for bringing this item to our attention, as he has many others.)
One of the LIB teachers (Jeff Brewer) is a critical member of the Chandra
team.
Jeff was/is a key engineer for the onboard power systems.
Research on Neanderthal DNA has become viable over the last couple of years due to tremendous changes in biotechnology that allow analysis of very small amounts of genetic material. The newest findings show the analyzed Neanderthal DNA from mitochondria differs by 7% from living humans. (This sample was extracted from bones thought to be only about 20,000 years old.) In comparison, chimp chromosomal DNA differs from humans by less than 2%. Modern humans differ among themselves by even less. This research is changing the way the science community views Neanderthal in relation to human evolution, and may change the way Christian apologetists view them. Previously, most studies had Neanderthal as Homo sapeins neanderthalensis, to indicate a very close relationship with modern humanity, just a subspecies, or race. This may view may be changing. It is certainly being challenged. In any event it is safe to say the final word on Neanderthal is not known. It would be premature to draw hard and fast conclusions at this time, either from science or from scripture.
Neanderthal is without a doubt the closest thing to human -- maybe fully human, maybe not -- that anthropologists have in their human "trees of evolution." So if Neanderthal is kicked off the human ancestor charts, the gap to any prior supposed ancestors just becomes huge! There is nothing between modern humans and erectus, which is at least a half million year gap! (Not to mention the huge differences in morphology and behavior.) Neanderthal also differs from other supposed human ancestors such as the Australopithecines in that for Neanderthal there are many whole body skeletons, in contrast to no whole body skeletons of australopithecines (mostly only bone fragments). Neanderthal is well documented in the fossil record. So, if Neanderthal's relationship to humanity is in doubt now, how can the relationship of any australopithecine to humans be as certain as is popularly protrayed in both media productions and textbooks? Answer: it can't be certain at all. Such is speculation based on the unchallenged presumption that humans evolved from common apelike ancestors. Now with Neanderthal possibly moving totally out of the human genetic tree, the gap to supposed prehuman ancestors has just gotten substantially larger. This also has another aspect that may be favorable to Christian views: if Neanderthal is kicked out, the age of humanity (homo sapiens) just got substantially younger. The ranges of dates for Neanderthal spans from 200 to 20 thousand years ago, with homo sapiens (Cromagnon) appearing abruptly about 20 to 40 thousand years ago. This puts the age of man well within a range that can be easily accomodated within scriptural descriptions of the lineages of the descendants of Adam and Eve. However, this raises other questions concerning Neanderthal. For example, how to understand the implications of advanced family altruism evidenced in Neaderthal care of diseased family members? How to understand the Neanderthal burials which included burial under a wreath of flowers? Many questions remain for those interested in the history of humanity. This would be an exciting area young Christians might wish to pursue as careers as well. These sciences need your perspective. One lesson this new research points up clearly: the more evidence found concerning human origins, the more muddy and uncertain becomes any evolutionary theory of human origin and the more viable becomes the creation perspective that Man is unique, specially created as a spiritual being, separate and apart from animals.
I will will be preparing a review article on this research in the future. Hill Roberts
The genetic design is possibly the strongest evidence that life is not
an accident but a complex intelligent design of purpose.
Since discovery of the double helix by Watson and Crick, genetic research
has exploded to include the Human Genome Project and mammaliam cloning.
This suite of article touches on the technology, the applications and
the ethical issues acknowledged by all. Well worth your time (small pun).
(Includes an e-discussion with Dr. James Watson from March 1999)
Message Encoded
in DNA by winner of Intel Science Talent search scholarship.
This gives an undenial example of the information paradigm for intelligent
design in the DNA genetic molecule.
Risca encoded in the DNA, "June 6 Invasion: Normandy" No accident ever
produced such a statement.
WASHINGTON -- Most Americans want evolution taught in public
schools but are not opposed to discussions of both God and Darwin, says
a People for the American Way poll on the hotly debated issue.
(Always be skeptical of poll results. Polls are opinion surveys, not
markers of truth. HR)
New neurological research is finding - unexpectedly - that the teen
years play a major role in determining who we will be for the rest
of our lives. Previously it was thought that one's "fate" was sealed about
age six in terms of brain development. Not true according to the new research.
This places a high premium on the continuing efforts of parents, teachers,
Bible teachers, and especially Teens themselves.
It's a "use it or lose it" situation. The teenage years are a
critical time to "optimize" the brain.
(read the abstract
of the article in Nature)
Creating matter in a mini-Big Bang (or not): CERN
Photos
--
CERN photos of the particle tracks
(click photos for larger images of these events, ~2MB each)
Smashing lead atoms together hard enough at CERN may have resulted
in "creating" a predicted state of matter only achievable at very high
energies. These energies are thought to be comparable to those in a novice
universe much less than a second old. While these particular results are
marginal, additional experiements later this year will almost surely be
adequate to determine if such a state of matter can exist. If so, this
lends credence to some of the cosmological notions assumed for an early
state of the universe which are consistent with a standard Big Bang model.
This does not prove this is how it happened, but does show it could have
happened in such a fashion. The term create is used in the sense of making
matter in a state not previously existing, not in the sense of making something
out of nothing.
The difficulty of converting energy to matter is enormous. In these
experiments, we might can see though a mortal window into the power of
the hand of God who created the Heavens and the Earth, and who upholds
them moment by moment through the power of His will.
Baby
Armas - An Astounding Photograph! - Dec 2, 99
![]() |
Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe
Peter Ward (paleontologist) and Donald Brownlee (astronomer) - University of Washington in Seattle It is not often that a book is news worthy, but I think this one is. Not because it tells us anything that others haven't been saying for years. Not because it unveils some new theory or findings. Not just because it is newly published this February 2000. It is news because this book is a demonstration of incredible courage. It bucks the wisdom of the entire NASA Astrobiology program, the golden boy of NASA CEO Dan Golden. It bucks the wisdom of the entire SETI program, championed by the late Carl Sagan. It bucks the wisdom of Frank Drake's equation underpinning both Golden and Sagan. This a a throughly secular book. It assumes naturalistic origins of life. In spite of that the implications for Intelligent Design of the Blue Planet are "in your face." See USA Today comment Feb 9 2000 Unique to the Universe Reminds me of Psalms 8 Click the book jacket here to see more reviews at Amazon.Com (can also order there) |
--
Now another "Ooops" revealed
The
"missing link" that wasn't
USA Today Feb 1, 2000
National Geographic issues a retraction of
its claims of finding a 125 million year old fossil
which is clearly half dinosaur and half bird,
as reported in fall of 1999 by National Geographic.
As is turns out this is exactly correct.
The lower half was from a dinosaur and the
upper half was from a bird!
Read the National
Geographic retraction and the
USA
Today report (1/25/00)
ScienceNews
report
AP
wire report
Also see scathing
letter from Smithsonian to NG
by Storrs L. Olson, Curator of Birds, National Museum of Natural History
Smithsonian Institution concerning the dino-to-bird mythology.
Be sure to notice on the Nat.Geo. page all
the "related stories."
It is fascinating how much undoing
there is to be done now in light of this revelation!
--
For Hill's discussion of the news concerning the revised Hubble and
Cosmological Constants
Click Here for
Hill's Overview
After reading my overview,
see if this latest ScienceNews Article (Feb 12) makes more sense.
The
Revved-Up Universe